The number of people fined for littering in Leeds has fallen by a fifth
It has been revealed that Leeds City Council has dished out a fifth fewer fines for littering in 2020, compared to the year previous.
The figures – which have been revealed as part of InYourArea.co.uk’s ‘Don’t Trash Our Future’ campaign launched last summer that aims to address the epidemic of littering in the UK – show that the council has issued a total of 2,331 fines last year.
This is compared to 2,958 fines handed out the year before.
A survey conducted of more than 7,500 people then also found that 85% saw litter as a big or major issue in their area, and almost two-thirds (64%) thought that the levels got worse as lockdown restriction eased.
Littering is a criminal offence, which carries a maximum fine of £2,500 and can be tried in a magistrates’ court, but councils often instead issue £100 fines with discounts for paying quickly, instead of taking people to court.
Failure to pay can lead to prosecution.
John Read – Founder of Clean Up Britain – said that “serious fines and serious enforcement” are needed to tackle littering across the country – but Leeds social entrepreneur Rob Greenland thinks a long-term cultural shift is needed instead to ensure people take pride in the city’s green spaces.
Mr Read said that £100 fines are “pathetic” and added that: “Councils need to understand that only behavioural change will resolve Britain’s litter epidemic.
“A £100 fine, reduced to £50 if paid in 14 days, is not going to change anyone’s behaviour.
“If local areas are to stop being litter-ridden – which most are – then we need serious fines and serious enforcement in this country.
“We have neither at the moment.”
But Mr Greenland argued that enforcement of littering laws should be a last resort, and said he’d be worried to see more fines handed out, stating: “I would have a bit of a concern that teenagers in skate parks are getting fined rather than a group of middle-class mums and dads having a picnic”.
He continued: “The only way you can tackle this is if you get people who have pride in a place, then those who might see a lot of people who care about a place and think ‘I shouldn’t drop litter’.
“A lot of parks have got ‘friends of’ groups that are really active [and] there’s Litter Free Leeds who are picking litter all the time.
“But that’s a longer term cultural shift.”
A Leeds City Council spokesperson said service disruptions caused by lockdowns, as well as lower footfall in usually-busy areas, should be taken into account when comparing yearly figures, and added that while the council aims to provide “more normal levels of litter clearance and prevention”, COVID restrictions mean that services may still be limited.
The spokesperson said: “Local community litter picking is also a growing resource in the city with Litter Free Leeds ‘Womble’ groups doing more and more to tackle litter in local neighbourhoods,
“We continue to take a zero tolerance policy to littering in Leeds [and] the issuing of fines is one of the many tools that we use to tackle littering in the city.
“We believe the best way to tackle the issue of littering is to engage positively and constructively with people of all ages to ensure people understand their responsibilities in relation to litter and waste and that sustainable behaviour change remains a priority [but] unfortunately, there are some people who will ignore these type of messages and continue to litter.
“Therefore we are committed to using our full range of legal enforcement powers to tackle such waste and litter crimes.”
David Renard – Environment Spokesperson for the Local Government Association – added that councils “work hard” to keep public spaces clean, but the pandemic has “undoubtedly” impacted the number of fines handed out.
“Responsibility for clearing up litter lies with the person dropping it or leaving it behind,” he said.
“The COVID-19 lockdown restrictions over the past year will have undoubtedly impacted the number of these handed out [and] each council has to decide the best way to tackle litter in their individual communities.
“But whilst we recognise that responses have to be proportionate, measures must be robust enough to tackle abuse of the local environment”.
Featured Image – Flickr